$1,2b Etisalat debt: lenders mull charges against Mubadala
By Kokumo Goodie, Lagos, Nigeria
There are indications that the consortium of 13 banks led by Zenith Bank to raise the $1.2billion loan for Etisalat Nigeria may press criminal charges against Directors of Mubadala Development Company of the United Arabs Emirate (UAE) in a fresh move to recover the outstanding part of the facility.
It was gathered that the banks held a meeting at the weekend where they considered engaging the services of a London-based corporate and commercial lawyer who is a Queen’s Counsel (QC) and a prominent Lagos-based Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) who is a respected voice in the human rights community to assemble a team of lawyers to press charges against Directors of Mubadala for abdicating their contractual obligations relating to the $1.2billion facility.
According to a source close to the meeting, the banks explored the legal option to save Etisalat Nigeria which they reportedly saw as still a viable business and also the need to ensure the continuity of Etisalat Nigeria in view of their lack of capacity to run a telecoms company.
“I can tell you that the banks have a different position now. The first thing considered at the meeting is the legal option to compel Mubadala through a Mareva injunction to honour its obligations to the consortium. This is because other than this loan crisis, Etisalat is a viable business. The banks have access to theirs books and they can see that despite the crisis, Etisalat’s business value has not diminished. That is why the banks took that position that they are not interested in a takeover of the business. They are in fact more sympathetic to the Nigerian investors led by Hakeem Belo-Osagie and are willing to work with him to steady the ship and keep Etisalat business going while searching for new investors,” the source said.
The source further said the lenders also felt that there was no need dissipating needless time and energy on the option of hostile takeover considering that the law is sacrosanct on that. “They realised the licence is not transferrable. So, they alternatively opted to pursue Mubadala for a recovery of the outstanding sum of money from the loan. The banks are said to be convinced of this option considering what they perceived to have been a trend with Mubadala. In each of the country where Mubadala had exited, it left behind burdens of unpaid loans,” the source added.
Another source close to one of the lenders who corroborated the development, said: “The banks rose from their weekend meeting with a strong resolve that Mubadala may have tried this trick with the wrong customer this time around. Yes, I can confirm they will press charges. Don’t forget Guaranty Trust Bank is veteran of a battle of this nature. Remember they pressed charges against Directors of the defunct HiTV to recoup their money. So, the other partners in the consortium are looking up to the guidance of GT Bank on this.”
Meanwhile, a leading Investment Analyst who works as External Consultant to the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), who spoke on condition of anonymity, has advocated a stronger involvement of the Federal Government at the diplomatic, economic and trade relations levels as options to save Etisalat Nigeria.
According to him, government needs to reach out to the Abu Dhabi government to rein in the Directors of Mubadala and compel them to respect a contractual loan obligation they entered into in Nigeria with the consortium of banks. At the economic level, the government must provide all necessary support under its “Ease of Doing Business” policy to new investors the Emerging Markets Telecommunications Services’ team led by Hakeem Belo-Osagie may be reaching out to. Key members of the nation’s Economic Management team such as the Minister of Industry, Trade and Investment, Minister of Finance and the Central Bank Governor can be directed to join the NCC to provide all necessary concessions to enable the new investors make their decision and settle in quickly,” he counseled.
“The second leg of the proposed economic intervention is for the government to direct the Sovereign Wealth Fund to invest in Etisalat considering its continued viability as a business. Telecom is a critical national infrastructure that represents the backbone of business, economic development and even national security. The intervention of the Sovereign Wealth Fund will not only preserve the jobs of thousands of Nigerians directly employed by Etisalat Nigeria but that of scores of other Nigerians indirectly employed in the entire value chain of the Etisalat business,” he said.
“Government needs to consider these facts. When Etisalat paid $400 million for its licence years ago, the revenue went into the Federation Account and the money was shared amongst the 36 states and indeed the Federal Government. If what we hear from FIRS is anything to go by, Etisalat has paid taxes in excess of $700 million in 9 years of its operations in Nigeria. So, asking the Sovereign Wealth Fund to invest in a company like this is a national economic imperative rather than a private capital decision”, he asserted.
While urging government to weigh the gains of saving Etisalat Nigeria against allowing it go under, the expert stated that choosing the latter option could lead to the loss of $565 million outstanding sum from the initial loan borrowed while depositors’ money will be lost in addition to the loss of revenue by contractors and service providers that depend on Etisalat for jobs. He also said the situation could result in job losses across the value chain. “So, government really has to make the better choice and act swiftly,” he said.